A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/131867.html below:

[Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic

[Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinic [Python-Dev] .clinic.c vs .c.clinicSerhiy Storchaka storchaka at gmail.com
Mon Jan 20 12:14:33 CET 2014
20.01.14 10:05, Larry Hastings написав(ла):
> The contestants so far:
>
> Contestant 1: "Add .clinic.h"
>
>     foo.c -> foo.c.clinic.h
>     foo.h -> foo.h.clinic.h

-0.5.

> Contestant 2: "Add .ac.h"
>
>     foo.c -> foo.c.ac.h
>     foo.h -> foo.h.ac.h

-1.

> Contestant 3: "Add .clinic"
>
>     foo.c -> foo.c.clinic
>     foo.h -> foo.h.clinic

+1. (Doesn't get included in global *.[ch] search, generated files are 
located close to origins.)

> Contestant 4: "Put in clinic directory, add .h"
>
>     foo.c -> clinic/foo.c.h
>     foo.h -> clinic/foo.h.h

-1. (Generated files are located far from origins, directory name 
clutters the namespace of directory names).

> Contestant 5: "Put in __clinic__ directory, add .h"
>
>     foo.c -> __clinic__/foo.c.h
>     foo.h -> __clinic__/foo.h.h

-0.5.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4