On 17/01/2014 17:46, Neil Schemenauer wrote: > > I think we should use %b instead of %s. In that case, I'm fine with > %b not accepting numbers. Using %b clearly indicates we are > inserting arbitrary bytes. It also proves a useful code review step > when translating from Python 2.x. > Using %b could cause problems in the future as b is used in new style formatting to mean output numbers in binary, so %B seems to me the obvious choice as it's also unused. -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4