A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/131770.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 461 - Adding % and {} formatting to bytes

[Python-Dev] PEP 461 - Adding % and {} formatting to bytes [Python-Dev] PEP 461 - Adding % and {} formatting to bytesBrett Cannon brett at python.org
Fri Jan 17 17:58:37 CET 2014
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:16 AM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote:

> On Jan 17, 2014, at 11:00 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> >I would rephrase it to "switch to %-formatting for bytes usage for their
> >common code base".
>
> -1.  %-formatting is so neanderthal. :)
>

Very much so, which is why I'm willing to let it be bastardized in Python
3.5 for the sake of porting but not bytes.format(). =) I'm keeping format()
clean for my nieces and nephew to use; they can just turn their nose up at
%-formatting when they are old enough to program.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140117/d42c52ce/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4