On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 1:18 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy at udel.edu> wrote: > On 1/16/2014 5:11 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >> Guido's successful counter was to point out that the parsing of the >> format string itself assumes ASCII compatible data, > > Did you see my explanation, which I wrote in response to one of your earlier > posts, of why I think "the parsing of the format string itself assumes ASCII > compatible data" that statement is confused and wrong? The above seems to > say that what I wrote is impossible, but perhaps I misunderstand what Guido > and you mean. Among my questions are "by data, do you mean interpolated > objects or interpolated bytes?" and "what restriction on 'data' do you > intend by 'ASCII compatible'?". Can you move the meta-discussion off-list? I'm getting tired of "did you understand what I said". -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4