On 1/16/2014 5:11 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > Guido's successful counter was to point out that the parsing of the > format string itself assumes ASCII compatible data, Did you see my explanation, which I wrote in response to one of your earlier posts, of why I think "the parsing of the format string itself assumes ASCII compatible data" that statement is confused and wrong? The above seems to say that what I wrote is impossible, but perhaps I misunderstand what Guido and you mean. Among my questions are "by data, do you mean interpolated objects or interpolated bytes?" and "what restriction on 'data' do you intend by 'ASCII compatible'?". -- Terry Jan Reedy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4