On 16/01/14 19:43, Larry Hastings wrote: > On 01/16/2014 04:21 AM, MRAB wrote: >> On 2014-01-16 05:32, Larry Hastings wrote: >> [snip] >> >>> We could add a special value, let's call it >>> sys.NULL, whose specific semantics are "turns into NULL when passed into >>> builtins". This would solve the problem but it's really, really awful. >>> >> Would it be better if it were called "__null__"? > > No. The problem is not the name, the problem is in the semantics. This > would mean a permanent special case in Python's argument parsing (and > "special cases aren't special enough to break the rules"), and would > inflict these same awful semantics on alternate implementations like > PyPy, Jython, and IronPython. Indeed. Why not just change the clinic spec a bit, from 'The "default" is a Python literal value.' to 'The "default" is a Python literal value or NULL.'? A NULL default would imply the parameter is optional with no default. Cheers, Mark.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4