16.01.14 08:05, Guido van Rossum написав(ла):
> In this specific case it's clear to me that the special-casing of
> negative count is intentional -- presumably it emulates sequence
> repetition, where e.g. 'a'*-1 == ''.
In this specific case it's contrary to sequence repetition. Because
repeat('a', -1) repeats 'a' forever. This is a point of Vajrasky's issue
[1].
> But not accepting None is laziness -- accepting either a number or
> None requires much more effort, if you need to have the number as a C
> integer. I'm not sure how AC could make this any easier, unless you
> want to special-case maxint or -maxint-1.
getattr(foo, 'bar', None) is not the same as getattr(foo, 'bar'). So
None can't be used as universal default value.
[1] http://bugs.python.org/issue19145
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4