RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jan 15 23:34:48 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/131655.html

On 15/01/2014 22:22, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve at pearwood.info
> <mailto:steve at pearwood.info>> wrote:
>
>     On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:55:31AM +1300, Greg Ewing wrote:
>      > Neil Schemenauer wrote:
>      > >Objects that implement __str__ can also implement __bytes__ if they
>      > >can guarantee that ASCII characters are always returned,
>      >
>      > I think __ascii_ would be a better name. I'd expect
>      > a method called __bytes__ on an int to return some
>      > version of its binary value.
>
>     +1
>
>
> If we are going the route of a new magic method then __ascii__ or
> __bytes_format__ get my vote as long as they only return bytes (I see no
> need to abbreviate to __bformat__ or __formatb__ when we have method
> names as long as __text_signature__ now).
>

__bytes_format__ gets my vote as it's blatantly obvious what it does. 
I'm against __ascii__ as I'd automatically associate that with ascii in 
the same way that I associate str with __str__ and repr with __repr__.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/131655.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 461 - Adding % and {} formatting to bytes