On 14Jan2014 11:43, Jim Jewett <jimjjewett at gmail.com> wrote: > Greg Ewing replied: > >> ... ASCII compatible binary data is a > >> *subset* of arbitrary binary data. > > I wrote: [...] > > (2) It *may* be worth creating a virtual > > split in the documentation. [...] > > Ethan likes the idea, but points out that the term > "Virtual" is confusing here. [...] > (A) What word should I use instead of "Virtual"? > Imaginary? Pretend? I'd title it in terms of a common use case, not a "virtual class". You even phrase the opening sentence as a use case already. > (B) Would it be good/bad/at least make the docs > easier to create an actual class (or alias)? > (C) Same question for a pair of classes provided > only in the documentation, like example code. I don't think so. People might use it:-( [...] > > A Bytes object could represent anything, [...] Tiny nit: shouldn't that be "bytes", not "Bytes"? > > appropriate as the underlying storage for a sound sample > > or image file. > > > > Virtual subclass ASCIIStructuredBytes > > ==================================== Possible alternate title: Common use case: bytes containing text sequences, especially ASCII Cheers, -- Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> I think... Therefore I ride. I ride... Therefore I am. - Mark Pope <erectus at yarrow.wt.uwa.edu.au>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4