On 01/14/2014 05:02 PM, Glenn Linderman wrote: > On 1/14/2014 2:38 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> >> I think Brett has the right idea: we shouldn't try to accept numbers >> for %s in binary interpolation. If we limit it to just buffer >> exporters and objects with a __bytes__ method then the problem goes away. >> >> The numeric codes all exist in Python 2, so the porting requirement to >> the common 2/3 subset will be to update the cases of binary >> interpolation of a number with %s to use an appropriate numeric >> formatting code instead. >> > +1 Agreed, PEP updated. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4