Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 15 Jan 2014 08:00, "Greg Ewing" <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz > <mailto:greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz>> wrote: > > > If so, would it help if asciistr were a built-in > > type, so that other things could be made aware of > > it? > > That way lies the Python 2 text model, and we're not going there. It's > probably best to think of asciistr as a way of demonstrating a > rhetorical point about the superiority of the Python 3 text model Hmmm... something like "The Python 3 text model is so superior that we have to use this weird hack to write something that makes perfectly good semantic sense but is very awkward to write otherwise" ?-) Anyhow, I've now convinced myself that asciistr as a type is completely unnecessary -- see earlier post. -- Greg
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4