On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > Yep - that's why I consider asciistr to be firmly in the "power tool" > category. If you know what you're doing, it should let you write hybrid API > code that is just as concise as Python 2, but it's also far more error prone > than the core Python 3 text model. Hm. It sounds like the kind of power tool that only candidates for the Darwin award would use. The more I hear you defend it, the less I think it's a good idea for *anything*. And limiting it to PyPy doesn't make it less dangerous. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4