On 01/14/2014 01:38 PM, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > On Jan 14, 2014, at 9:12 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net > <mailto:solipsis at pitrou.net>> wrote: > >> I'm +1 on the sidefile approach. +0 on the various buffer approaches. >> -0.5 on the current "sprinkled everywhere" approach. > > I concur with Antoine except that I'm a full -1 on commingling > generated code with hand edited code. Sprinked everywhere > interferes with my ability to grok the code. It interferes with > code navigation. And it creates a greater risk of accidentally > editing the generated code. > > FWIW, I think everyone should place a lot of weight on > Serhiy's comments and suggestions. His reasoning is > clear and compelling. And the thoughts are all soundly > based on extensive experience with the clinic's effect on > the C source code. For the record I don't much care which of these Clinic does. My hope is just that the Python core dev community accepts Argument Clinic. If it forms a consensus around changing Clinic's output I'd be happy to oblige. But there's one important caveat to the above. As I recall, Guido has stated that he hates storing generated code in separate files. He has yet to rescind or weaken that pronouncement. Until such time as he does, the "side file" approach is off the table. I implemented it in the prototype purely for the purpose of fostering debate, so the "side file" proponents can try to convince him that it's necessary or that it's not so bad. But it's not going in without Guido's approval. As you yourself say--"Python is Guido's language, he just lets us use it." I'm not the person you have to convince, //arry/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140114/da6e62c2/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4