Nick Coghlan writes: > "Give up" makes it sound like I got tired of arguing without being > convinced rather than admitting I was just plain wrong. I thought it was something in between (you explicitly said "lenient PEP 460" doesn't hurt you, but my understanding was you still believe that there's a safer way, and it's the latter you aren't going to try to convince folks of). > While I'll still work on the asciistr proposal, Thank you for that. I really wish I had time to, myself, but not for several weeks... :-( > that's unrelated to PEP 460 - it's about making hybrid APIs less "It" refers to asciistr or to PEP 460? > painful to write in Python 3 when you're willing to place the > burden of ensuring ASCII compatibility of binary data on the > calling code. Versus what?
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4