On 01/13/2014 01:20 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote: > On 13/01/2014 21:01, Paul Moore wrote: >> >> I think this should be for 3.5, and should not involve an accelerated >> release of 3.5 - we should get it into the 3.5 code early and let >> people thrash out the details during the 3.5 release cycle. > > I disagree, it should be on pypi now so people can start trying it out, or as others have suggested incorporate it into > the six module. Surely that'd make the job of getting it into 3.5 far easier? It's a bit harder to put a core feature on PyPI. I'm not even sure how it would be done. Fortunately, once it is in 3.5 trunk the adventurous can build their own and try it out that way. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4