On 14 Jan 2014 03:34, "Guido van Rossum" <guido at python.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 13 January 2014 23:57, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote: > >> 1) What do we need in terms of functionality > >> > >> Best guess, %s, %d, and %f. I've not done a full audit of the code, but some > >> limited looking over the grep hits for % in .py files suggests I'm right, > >> and we could even do without %f (we only use that for 'hg --time' output, > >> which we could do in unicode). > > > > I think PEP 460 will have you covered there, or hopefully asciistr on 3.3+ > > I'm confused on how PEP 460 would help -- Augie mentioned %d, which it excludes. I meant your proposed more lenient version (since there's no need for the binary only version to be in the common 2/3 subset). Cheers, Nick. > > -- > --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140114/ea7cdbcb/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4