RetroSearch Browse

Mon Jan 13 22:00:53 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/131442.html

13.01.14 15:57, Augie Fackler написав(ла):
> 1) What do we need in terms of functionality
>
> Best guess, %s, %d, and %f. I've not done a full audit of the code, but
> some limited looking over the grep hits for % in .py files suggests I'm
> right, and we could even do without %f (we only use that for 'hg --time'
> output, which we could do in unicode).

Most popular formatting codes in Mercurial sources (excluding %Y, %M, etc):

    2519 %s
     493 %d
     102 %r
      33 %i
      23 %ld
      19 %ln
      12 %.3f
      10 %.1f
       9 %(val)r
       9 %p
       9 %.2f

%s covers almost 80% of use cases and %d covers almost 20%. %r covers 
about 3%, %f covers less than 1%. So I think anything except %s and %d 
can be ignored.

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/131442.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP460 thoughts from a Mercurial dev