On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Yury Selivanov <yselivanov.ml at gmail.com> wrote: > On January 13, 2014 at 3:08:43 PM, Daniel Holth (dholth at gmail.com) wrote: >> >> I see it now. b"foo%sbar" % b'baz' should also expand to b"foob'foo'bar" >> >> Instead of "%b" could "%j" mean "I should have used + or join() >> here >> but was too lazy" and work on str too? > > Isn’t this just error prone? Since it’s a new format character, many, > probably, would write %s by mistake. And, besides, there was no %j > in python2. Merely a flesh wound.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4