On January 13, 2014 at 3:08:43 PM, Daniel Holth (dholth at gmail.com) wrote: > > I see it now. b"foo%sbar" % b'baz' should also expand to b"foob'foo'bar" > > Instead of "%b" could "%j" mean "I should have used + or join() > here > but was too lazy" and work on str too? Isn’t this just error prone? Since it’s a new format character, many, probably, would write %s by mistake. And, besides, there was no %j in python2. - Yury
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4