On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 8:51 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 13 January 2014 23:57, Augie Fackler <raf at durin42.com> wrote: > >> 1) What do we need in terms of functionality > >> > >> Best guess, %s, %d, and %f. I've not done a full audit of the code, but > some > >> limited looking over the grep hits for % in .py files suggests I'm > right, > >> and we could even do without %f (we only use that for 'hg --time' > output, > >> which we could do in unicode). > > > > I think PEP 460 will have you covered there, or hopefully asciistr on > 3.3+ > > I'm confused on how PEP 460 would help -- Augie mentioned %d, which it > excludes. Yes - not having %d makes this much much less useful to me. For my part, it'd probably be fine if we could do %s (which would handle an RHS that was bytes, and only bytes, no handing of str or __bytes__-type stuff at all) and %d (with all the usual format modifiers, and would result in an ascii-compatible sequence of bytes all the time). -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140113/0b074a9e/attachment-0001.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4