On 01/12/2014 06:11 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > On Sun, Jan 12, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: >> On 01/12/2014 04:47 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: >>> %s seems the trickiest: I think with a bytes argument it should just >>> insert those bytes (and the padding modifiers should work too), and >>> for other types it should probably work like %a, so that it works as >>> expected for numeric values, and with a string argument it will return >>> the ascii()-variant of its repr(). Examples: >>> >>> b'%s' % 42 == b'42' >>> b'%s' % 'x' == b"'x'" (i.e. the three-byte string containing an 'x' >>> enclosed in single quotes) >> >> I'm not sure about the quotes. Would anyone ever actually want those in the >> byte stream? > > Perhaps not, but it's a hint that you should probably think about an > encoding. It's symmetric with how '%s' % b'x' returns "b'x'". Think of > it as payback time. :-) Well that's hardly fair! I never liked the "b'x'" either! ;) Okay, I can live with that symmetry. -- ~Ethan~
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4