On 01/12/2014 02:52 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > You are right, it is not ok. The wording wasn't constructive or > controlled at all. I'd like to apologize for that. Thank you. Apology accepted. > At the same point, I was expressing a fair amount of frustration. I > think the last discussion rounds have largely failed to produce any > new meaningful insight (to the point that I've stopped reading several > subthreads). IMO the best thing *for now* would be to "agree to > disagree", let things bake in everyone's mind for some time, and > revisit the subject in some weeks. For the most part I agree. I did, though, finally figure out what Nick thought I wanted, so there was at least a little progress. But yes, I think tabling the discussion for now, and working on Brett's ideas, is entirely appropriate. -- ~Ethan~ P.S. Direct reply so you don't miss my response. :)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4