On 12 Jan 2014 22:10, "Paul Moore" <p.f.moore at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 12 January 2014 09:23, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > >> On 12 January 2014 01:01, Victor Stinner <victor.stinner at gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Supporting formating integers would allow to write b"Content-Length: > >>> %s\r\n" % 123, which would work on Python 2 and Python 3. > >> > >> I'm surprised that no-one is mentioning b"Content-Length: %s\r\n" % > >> str(123) which works on Python 2 and 3, is explicit, and needs no > >> special-casing of int in the format code. > > > > Certainly doesn't work on Python 3 right now, and never should :) > > Sorry, I meant str(123).encode("ascii"), and I'd probably use a helper > function for it. > > I could easily argue at this point that this is the type of bug that > having %-formatting operations on bytes would encourage - %s means > "format a string" (from years of C and Python (text) experience) so I > automatically supply a string argument when using %s in a bytes > formatting context. > > The reality is that I was probably just being sloppy, though :-) It's also something asciistr will help with once it is working - asciistr(123) on the RHS will work in both versions. Cheers, Nick. > Paul > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140112/3b5ff90d/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4