RetroSearch Browse

Sat Jan 11 19:14:54 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/131229.html

On Jan 11, 2014, at 10:38 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:

>You've already stated you don't care that much and are willing to let the PEP
>as-is be rejected.  Why not remove your name and let Victor have it back?  Is
>he not the original author?  (If this is protocol just say so -- remember I'm
>still new to the ways of PyDev. :).

From a procedural point of view, I would say that it's entirely appropriate
for a PEP to have open questions, alternatives, and options.  Have it lay out
the arguments pro and con and let Guido or the appointed PEP czar make the
final decision.  Then the PEP can be amended with those decisions, and if
folks still think more needs to be done, a follow up PEP can be filed.

-Barry

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/131229.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 460: allowing %d and %f and mojibake