On 07/01/2014 22:11, Skip Montanaro wrote: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 2:46 PM, Barry Warsaw <barry at python.org> wrote: >> I think we should be willing to entertain breaking feature freeze for getting >> this in Python 3.4. > > Maybe you could revert 3.4 to alpha status and give it a cycle or two > there to get this done before returning to beta status. > > Skip > When I first saw the suggestion from Georg I had visions of men in white coats gragging him off :) Having giving the idea more thought I think there's any opportunity here and now to make a very profound long term impact for Python 3. Skip's idea seems to me a clean way to do this. Short term pain, long term gain? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4