On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Skip Montanaro <skip at pobox.com> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> > wrote: > >> I agree with Serhiy, but that is probably known at this point. :) > > > > I agree with Serhiy and you too. Clinic's current output makes C files > > more tedious to read, and I'm not really willing to participate in the > > "conversion derby" because of that. > > My first thought was that this exercise falls into the realm of fixing > things which aren't broken. > The gain in introspection now and possible automated improvements later (e.g. if we come up with a faster way to parse arguments it will automatically propagate through the code base) make it worth it. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140106/09d1dc82/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4