On Mon, 6 Jan 2014 00:25:53 +0100 Stefan Krah <stefan at bytereef.org> wrote: > Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > > > I had that working at one point. Guido said no, keep it all in one file. > > > I'm flexible but first you'd have to convince him. > > > > It's also not something we're stuck with forever - we can start with it inline > > (which has the advantage of keeping all the code in the same place), and later > > move to having the helpers in a separate file included from the implementation > > file if we decide it makes sense to do so. > > If we move big chunks of code around twice, I guess "hg blame" will break > twice, too. That is another thing worth considering. Breaking on generated code doesn't sound very annoying, though. > I agree with Serhiy, but that is probably known at this point. :) I agree with Serhiy and you too. Clinic's current output makes C files more tedious to read, and I'm not really willing to participate in the "conversion derby" because of that. What were Guido's arguments? Also, see http://bugs.python.org/issue19723 Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4