On 1/4/14 10:42 PM, Ben Finney wrote: > Luca Sbardella <luca.sbardella at gmail.com> writes: > >> you are my heroes but this survey is quite useless, can you include more >> people? > The survey cohort was self-selected from those who read the forums where > it was posted. > >> I wasn't aware of it so many thousands of python users. > That statement confuses me. Were you aware of it, or not? How did you > become aware of it? > >> And after that, you are well aware that Python 3 or 2 is becoming a >> liability, just stick with one, anyone (3) at this point. > The policy of the Python core developers is quite clear, and has been > for many years: Python 2 is a dead end, and Python 2.7 (released > 2010-07-03, 3½ years ago) is the last Python 2. > > Python 2.7 is the last of the Python 2 line, there will never be new > Python 2 features <URL:http://python.org/dev/peps/pep-0404/>, everyone > should migrate to Python 3. > > That is already the Python core developers's published policy. So, to > whom are you speaking here on the Python core developers' forum? > >> I don't want to go and learn a new language, please. > Great! If you already know Python, then there is very little (certainly > not “a new language”) different to move from Python 2.7 to Python 3. > > Enjoy! > I think it helps Luca and many others (including myself) if there is a reference of the difference between 2.7 and Python 3.3+. There are PEPs and books, but is there any such long list of references? If not, should we start investing in one? I know the basic one such as xrange and range, items vs iteritems, izip vs zip that sort of uniform syntax/library inclusion difference. If there is such reference available? Yeuk Hon
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4