On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Glenn Linderman <v+python at g.nevcal.com> wrote: > Yes. But the point is really the location of the (), sorry if my "nice > extension" comment is throwing you off that track. Ah! I see. We touched on this syntax on -ideas, but at the time, the proposed syntax didn't have parens around the outside. Either location will solve most of the same problems (like precedence/associativity versus multiple except clauses), but shrinking down to just the exception list and default value makes it look very different. It looks like what's inside should be an expression, which it isn't. What's the advantage of this form? What's its key advantage over the parens-around-the-whole-thing form? ChrisA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4