On 21 Feb 2014, at 16:52, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 1:34 AM, Brett Cannon <brett at python.org> wrote: >> While I like the general concept, I agree that it looks too much like a >> crunched statement; the use of the colon is a non-starter for me. I'm sure >> I'm not the only one whose brain has been trained to view a colon in Python >> to mean "statement", period. This goes against that syntactic practice and >> just doesn't work for me. >> >> I'm -1 with the current syntax, but it can go into the + range if a better >> syntax can be chosen. > > We bikeshedded that extensively on -ideas. The four best options are: > > value = (expr except Exception: default) > value = (expr except Exception -> default) > value = (expr except Exception pass default) > value = (expr except Exception then default) > > Note that the last option involves the creation of a new keyword. > > Would any of the others feel better to you? What about (also mentioned in the PEP)? value = (expr except Exception try default) This seems to read nicely, although “try” is at a completely different position than it is in the equivalent try statement. I like the general idea, but like Brett I don’t like using a colon here at all. Ronald P.S. Sorry if this way already brought up, I’ve browsed through most of the threads on this on -ideas and -dev, but haven’t read all messages. > > ChrisA > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ronaldoussoren%40mac.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4