On Sun, 23 Feb 2014 12:42:59 -0800 Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > On 02/23/2014 03:33 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:56:50 -0800 > > Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > >> > >> ``%a`` will call :func:``ascii()`` on the interpolated value's :func:``repr()``. > >> This is intended as a debugging aid, rather than something that should be used > >> in production. Non-ascii values will be encoded to either ``\xnn`` or ``\unnnn`` > >> representation. > > > > Why is "%a" here? I don't remember: was this discussed before? > > "Intended as a debugging aid" sounds like a weak justification to me. > > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-January/131808.html > > The idea being if we offer %a, folks won't be tempted to abuse __bytes__. Which folks are we talking about? This sounds gratuitous. Also, I don't understand what debugging is supposed to be in the context of bytes formatting. You print debugging output to a text stream, not a bytes stream. And you certainly *don't* print debugging output into a wire protocol. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4