On Sat, 22 Feb 2014 17:56:50 -0800 Ethan Furman <ethan at stoneleaf.us> wrote: > > ``%a`` will call :func:``ascii()`` on the interpolated value's :func:``repr()``. > This is intended as a debugging aid, rather than something that should be used > in production. Non-ascii values will be encoded to either ``\xnn`` or ``\unnnn`` > representation. Why is "%a" here? I don't remember: was this discussed before? "Intended as a debugging aid" sounds like a weak justification to me. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4