On 23 February 2014 02:29, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > On 22 Feb 2014 22:15, "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote: > > Antoine Pitrou writes: > > > Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote: > > > > hasattr(x,"y") <-> (x.y or True except AttributeError: False) > > > But it's not the same. hasattr() returns a boolean, not an arbitrary > > > value. > > I think he meant > > hasattr(x,"y") <-> (x.y and True except AttributeError: False) > > With PEP 463, the explicit equivalent of hasattr() would be something like > : > > hasattr(x,"y") <-> (bool(x.y) or True except AttributeError: False) > That would work, but I think I'd prefer: hasattr(x,"y") <-> bool(x.y or True except AttributeError: False) Makes it clearer IMO that the entire expression will always return a boolean. If exception expressions already existed in the language, I would think there would be a strong argument for a library function hasattr(), but probably not a builtin. Tim Delaney -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140223/97c613de/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4