[re: "as" clause] On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 6:20 AM, Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan at gmail.com> wrote: > It's probably OK to leave it in the deferred section and just note the > difficulty of implementing it in a backwards compatible way, since > we're *not* going to be introducing a closure. Agreed. -eric
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4