On 21 Feb 2014 08:38, "Matthias Klose" <doko at ubuntu.com> wrote: > > Am 19.02.2014 22:18, schrieb Nick Coghlan: > > and the Ubuntu 14.04 deadline restricts our ability to add a 3rd rc. > > well, I think it would be wrong to restrict that for only that reason. I did > object to delay the release cycle a second time for completing a feature. If > the release has to be delayed for QA reasons, that's a good reason. Having a > Debian background myself ;) > > I'm fine to ship with a rc3 too, and update it post-release, after wading > through distribution bureaucracy ... but please don't use this as an example of > a distribution influencing an upstream. There are "better" examples for this :-/ Thanks for the clarification. That said, supporting someone else's external deadline can definitely help with resisting the urge to allow "just one more little adjustment" :) Cheers, Nick. > > Matthias > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140221/022bb687/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4