On Thu, 20 Feb 2014 10:24:16 +0900 "Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen at xemacs.org> wrote: > > The argument that a "read-only, no cherrypicking by committers" repo > is nothing but a better tarball is valid, but as I say, AFAICS the > expected gain is pretty marginal. The conflict here is not Larry's > process, it's the decision to make an ambitious release on a short > time schedule. I don't really buy the "short time schedule" argument. The delay between 3.3 and 3.4 is ~18 months as usual. Regards Antoine.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4