On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 1:42 AM, Georg Brandl <g.brandl at gmx.net> wrote: > Am 19.02.2014 00:54, schrieb Barry Warsaw: > > On Feb 19, 2014, at 12:38 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > > > >>Am 17.02.2014 00:25, schrieb Larry Hastings: > >>> And my local branch will remain private until 3.4.0 final ships! > >> > >>sorry, but this is so wrong. Is there *any* reason why to keep this > branch > >>private? > > > > IMO, no. read-only for !larry sure, but not private. > > I emphatically agree. There is no need at all for secrecy, or paranoia. > > And it is very understandable that vendors (or even "just" our binary > building experts) want to make as many tests with what will be RC2 and > then final as they can, to catch possible issues before release. > That's why it's RC2 and not 3.4final, right? Once Larry says it's baked, everyone *will* have a chance to test it. What value is a preview of the preview really going to add? Give Larry some trust and freedom to do things in the way that makes him comfortable. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140219/53214ecf/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4