On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 5:10 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Sorry if this has already been suggested, but why not introduce a new > singleton to make the database people happier if not happy? To avoid > confusion call it dbnull? A reasonable compromise or complete cobblers? :) I think this is possible already, for the database people. The problem is that it will not pass the is None test, which at the very least is not backwards compatible with how they have used it before.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4