Thanks, I see. Greg already filed a tracking issue, so it's covered anyway. On 17 February 2014 15:33, Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org> wrote: > On 02/16/2014 03:45 PM, Paul Moore wrote: > > <http://bugs.python.org/issue20621> is significant enough to be > resulting in a 3.3.5 release - can you make sure the 3.4 fix goes in? > I'm not sure how to find the revision number that contains the fix to > follow the process you outline above, so I'm just mentioning it here & > on the issue to make sure it's not missed... > > > If it has an issue number like that, then generally Roundup Robot will > notify the issue when something is checked in. And those comments will have > the revision id in them. > > Also, you can scan the output of "hg log" to find the revision numbers. The > first line of each stanza looks like > > changeset: 89231:75a12cf63f20 > > Here, "75a12cf63f20" is the revision id. > > > /arry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4