A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-February/132401.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 3.4: What to do about the Derby patches

[Python-Dev] Python 3.4: What to do about the Derby patches [Python-Dev] Python 3.4: What to do about the Derby patchesVictor Stinner victor.stinner at gmail.com
Mon Feb 17 01:03:07 CET 2014
Hi,

The PEP 436 is still a draft and not mentionned in Python 3.4
changelog. The PEP proposes to add a DSL, not to modify all modules
implemented in C. I think that it should be marked as Final and
mentionned in the changelog.
http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0436/

2014-02-16 19:31 GMT+01:00 Larry Hastings <larry at hastings.org>:
> Here's how I propose we move forward.
>
> 1) We merge the Derby patch for the builtins module into 3.4, simply because
> it will "demo well".

Where is the issue to implement this feature? Anyway, I expect a huge
patch which is non-trivial and so very risky for such a very important
module :-/ It's too late IMO.

Victor
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4