RetroSearch Browse

Sun Feb 16 10:06:34 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-February/132373.html

Am 16.02.2014 09:40, schrieb Ezio Melotti:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 7:45 AM, Ezio Melotti <ezio.melotti at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Sun, May 5, 2013 at 4:23 AM, Tim Delaney <timothy.c.delaney at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It appears there's no obvious link from bugs.python.org to the contributor
>>> agreement - you need to go via the unintuitive link Foundation ->
>>> Contribution Forms (and from what I've read, you're prompted when you add a
>>> patch to the tracker).
>>>
>>> I'd suggest that if the "Contributor Form Received" field is "No" in user
>>> details, there be a link to http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/.
>>>
>>
>> See http://psf.upfronthosting.co.za/roundup/meta/issue461.
>>
> 
> This is now done: users who submit(ted) patches without having signed
> the contributor agreement will get a note in tracker with the link and
> a short explanation.
> (Sorry it took me so long to get this fixed.)

Thanks, that is a great improvement.  (Although I don't think I like the
red background color... )

Georg

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-February/132373.html below:

[Python-Dev] CLA link from bugs.python.org