On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 3:47 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solipsis at pitrou.net> wrote: > On Sat, 8 Feb 2014 15:32:23 -0800 > Guido van Rossum <guido at python.org> wrote: > > We could really use more help reviewing and finishing asyncio's docs! > > Well, it's probably difficult for people to help when they are not > acquainted with the details of asyncio's functioning :-) > Very funny. :-) But seriously: as a potential reviewer, you can try to write a simple asyncio app from scratch using the docs available, and report (preferably on the python-tulip list) any issues you encountered, whether they be English spelling or grammar (if those are your thing), confusing on incorrect documentation, missing or buggy examples, and so on. Plenty of people so far have contributed *code*, even without documentation (apart from PEP 3156), and it should be just as easy to contribute *docs*. -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140208/6a36edcc/attachment.html>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4