RetroSearch Browse

Tue Feb 4 10:56:40 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-February/132251.html

On 02/03/2014 01:10 PM, Zachary Ware wrote:
> What about just choosing a marker value that is somewhat less
> unsightly?  "signature = (", or "parameters: (", or something (better)
> to that effect?  It may not be beautiful in 3.3, but we can at least
> make it make sense.

It's a reasonable enough idea, and we could consider it if we stick with 
something like "sig=".  However, see later in the thread where Guido 
says to return to the old somewhat-ambiguous form with the function 
name.  ;-)

//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140204/e844cf08/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-February/132251.html below:

[Python-Dev] The docstring hack for signature information has to go