RetroSearch Browse

Tue Feb 4 10:55:12 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-February/132250.html

On 02/03/2014 12:55 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
> I think the solution adopted should be future-oriented (ie, clean in 
> the future) even if the cost is slight awkwardness in 3.3.

Just a minor point: I keep saying 3.3, but I kind of mean "3.2 through 
3.3".  I believe the binary ABI shipped with 3.2.  However, in practice 
I suspect there are few installations that

  * are still on 3.2, and
  * will ever use binary-ABI-clean third-party modules compiled against
    3.4+ that contain signatures.

//arry/
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20140204/7440bb84/attachment.html>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-February/132250.html below:

[Python-Dev] The docstring hack for signature information has to go