Maciej Fijalkowski wrote: > After reading this http://bugs.python.org/issue23085 and remembering struggling > having our own patches into cpython's libffi (but not into libffi itself), I > wonder, is there any reason any more for libffi being included in CPython? We use it for ctypes, so there's certainly still a need. Are you asking whether we need a fork of it as opposed to treating it like an external (like OpenSSL)? > Cheers, > fijal
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4