A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-December/137601.html below:

[Python-Dev] Python 2.x and 3.x use survey, 2014 edition

[Python-Dev] Python 2.x and 3.x use survey, 2014 editionSkip Montanaro skip.montanaro at gmail.com
Tue Dec 16 21:15:53 CET 2014
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Marko Rauhamaa <marko at pacujo.net> wrote:
>
> IMO, you should consider forking your library code for Python2 and
> Python3.
>

I don't get the idea that Brett Cannon agrees with you:

http://nothingbutsnark.svbtle.com/commentary-on-getting-your-code-to-run-on-python-23

While he doesn't explicitly say so, I got the distinct impression reading
his recent blog post that he supports one source, not forked sources.

In the absence to evidence to the contrary, I think of Brett as the most
expert developer in the porting space.

Skip
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20141216/bc72ef4f/attachment.html>
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4