yes that was mentioned in this thread, %nN looks quite reasonable. still, I'd like to steer the conversation back to the other aspect - where should something like struct_timespec land in the first place, is datetime really the best to capture that? Most of the conversation has been revolving around strftime/strptime. That seems to validate Antoine's point in the first place. Let's see what people say but maybe this thread should end to restart as separate topics? Regards, Matthieu On 12/16/14 11:08 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 11:10 AM, matthieu bec <mbec at gmto.org > <mailto:mbec at gmto.org>> wrote: > > Agreed with Antoine, strftime/strptime are somewhat different concerns. > > Doesn't mean thay cannot be fixed at the same time but it's a bit a > > separate. > > Which reminds me... Somewhere else (maybe elsewhere in this thread? > maybe on a bug tracker issue?) someone mentioned that Ruby uses %N for > fractions of a second (and %L specifically for milliseconds). Here's the > bit from the Ruby strftime doc: > > %L - Millisecond of the second (000..999) > %N - Fractional seconds digits, default is 9 digits (nanosecond) > %3N millisecond (3 digits) > %6N microsecond (6 digits) > %9N nanosecond (9 digits) > %12N picosecond (12 digits) > > There's no obvious reason I can see to reinvent this particular wheel, > at least the %N spoke. The only question might be whether to modify > Python's existing %f format to accept a precision (defaulting to 6), or > add %N in a manner similar (or identical) to Ruby's semantics. > > Skip > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev at python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/mdcb808%40gmail.com > -- Matthieu Bec GMTO Corp cell : +1 626 425 7923 251 S Lake Ave, Suite 300 phone: +1 626 204 0527 Pasadena, CA 91101
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4