On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote: > So that's basically it, lowest common demoniator programming where it's hard to > look at the future and see anything but the same (or similar) language subset > that I'm currently using. This is especially frustrating when you see other > languages doing cool and interesting new things and it feels like we're stuck > with what we had in 2008 or 2010. That's what happens when you want to support a version of Python that was released in 2008 or 2010. Perhaps the impetus for people to move onto Python 3 has to come from people like you saying "I'm not going to support 2.7 any more as of version X.Y", and letting them run two interpreters. It's really not that hard to keep 2.7 around for what expects it, and 3.4/3.5/whatever for everything else. ChrisA
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4