A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-December/137422.html below:

[Python-Dev] hg vs Github [was: PEP 481

[Python-Dev] hg vs Github [was: PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github] [Python-Dev] hg vs Github [was: PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github]Jim J. Jewett jimjjewett at gmail.com
Mon Dec 1 18:37:21 CET 2014
M. Cepl asked:

> What I really don't understand is why this discussion is hg v.  
> GitHub, when it should be hg v. git. Particular hosting is 
> a secondary issue

I think even the proponents concede that git isn't better enough
to justify a switch in repositories.

They do claim that GitHub (the whole environment; not just the
hosting) is so much better that a switch to GitHub is justified.

Github + hg offers far fewer benefits than Github + git, so also
switching to git is part of the price.  Whether that is an
intolerable markup or a discount is disputed, as are the value
of several other costs and benefits.

-jJ

--

If there are still threading problems with my replies, please
email me with details, so that I can try to resolve them.  -jJ
More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4