RetroSearch Browse

Mon Dec 1 02:14:38 CET 2014 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-December/137377.html

On 11/30/2014 04:31 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 29 November 2014 at 23:27, Donald Stufft <donald at stufft.io> wrote:
>> In previous years there was concern about how well supported git was on Windows
>> in comparison to Mercurial. However git has grown to support Windows as a first
>> class citizen. In addition to that, for Windows users who are not well aquanted
>> with the Windows command line there are GUI options as well.
>
> I have little opinion on the PEP as a whole, but is the above
> statement true? From the git website, version 2.2.0 is current, and
> yet the downloadable Windows version is still 1.9.4. That's a fairly
> significant version lag for a "first class citizen".
>
> I like git, and it has a number of windows-specific extensions that
> are really useful (more than Mercurial, AFAIK), but I wouldn't say
> that the core product supported Windows on an equal footing to Linux.

I'm curious about These useful extension. Can you elaborate?

-- 
Pierre-Yves David

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-December/137377.html below:

[Python-Dev] PEP 481 - Migrate Some Supporting Repositories to Git and Github